Rapid Prototyping Services in China

Coordinate visual models, functional prototypes, and bridge parts using CNC machining, SLA/SLS printing, vacuum casting, or other project-appropriate routes.

Low-quantity sourcing for prototype validation
Lead time confirmed after file and DFM review
Process selection based on test objective and budget

Choose the Right Prototyping Process

1: CNC Prototyping

Best for metal & high-strength plastic. Real material properties.

2: SLA/SLS 3D Printing

Useful for complex geometry and detailed visual models.

3: Vacuum Casting

Best for low volume (10-50 pcs). Silicone mold copy.

4: Rapid Tooling

Best for 100+ pcs real injection molded parts.

Prototyping Specifications

ProcessTypical ToleranceMax SizeLead Time
CNC Machining±0.05mm (Metals)3000mm3-5 Days
SLA 3D Printing±0.1mm600mm2-3 Days
SLS 3D Printing±0.2mm400mm3-4 Days
Vacuum Casting±0.2mm1000mm7-10 Days

Materials Available for Prototyping

PlasticsMetals
ABSAluminum 6061/7075
PCStainless Steel 303/304
PMMA (Acrylic)Brass
Nylon (PA6/PA66)Copper
PEEKTitanium alloy
POMCarbon steel

Define What the Prototype Must Prove

A prototype should answer a specific engineering question. Visual models are useful for shape, presentation, and early user feedback. Functional prototypes need material behavior, threads, sealing surfaces, heat resistance, stiffness, or assembly fit that is close to the intended product. Bridge parts may need the same material and inspection logic planned for low-volume production.

The process should be selected from the test objective, not only from the fastest advertised lead time. CNC prototype machining is often appropriate for production-grade metals and engineering plastics. SLA can support detailed visual models. SLS is useful for complex nylon parts. Vacuum casting can reproduce a master model for a small batch where molded appearance is more important than exact production-material behavior. Rapid tooling may be considered when real injection-molded material is required.

Prototype DFM Checklist

  • Identify the surfaces and dimensions that affect assembly or testing.
  • Separate critical tolerances from dimensions that can use a general tolerance.
  • Confirm threads, inserts, sealing grooves, undercuts, and inaccessible features.
  • State whether the finish is cosmetic, functional, or only required for presentation.
  • Provide mating-part information when fit is the main test objective.
  • Define the number of prototypes and the likely next production quantity.

These inputs help determine whether the prototype should be machined in one setup, split into components, printed, cast, or simplified for the first test cycle.

Tolerances, Lead Time, and Inspection

Published tolerances and lead times are starting references, not automatic commitments. Actual capability depends on part size, geometry, material, wall thickness, datum strategy, finishing, quantity, and inspection requirements. Delivery timing is confirmed after the files and DFM risks have been reviewed.

For fit-critical prototypes, the quotation should identify the inspection method and the dimensions that will be reported. Material certificates, dimensional reports, finish samples, or functional checks can be requested where relevant and are confirmed before the order.

Moving From Prototype to Low Volume

Before repeating a successful prototype, record the approved material, revision, critical dimensions, finish standard, inspection method, and packaging. Fixture strategy and process controls may need to change when quantity increases. SP Precision coordinates the RFQ, DFM questions, quotations, and supplier follow-up so that prototype feedback is carried into the next production stage.

Send the 3D model, 2D drawing, quantity, test objective, material, finish, and required delivery location for a project-specific review.

Scroll to Top
WhatsApp